In the midst of Hong Kong’s evolving socio-political landscape, the Court of Appeal’s decision to ban “Glory to Hong Kong” underscores the delicate balance between national security and freedom of expression. Upholding principles of legality and proportionality, the ruling navigates the complexities of safeguarding public safety while respecting individual rights. Despite concerns over its impact on dissent, exemptions for academic and journalistic purposes emphasise the ongoing struggle to reconcile security imperatives with democratic values.
Comments